3D Measurement Specialists

Offices Worldwide - 25 Years Experience

Sign-up for a complimentary 3D Scanning industry magazine

     Home     |     Services     |     Products     |    News & Case Studies    |  Contact Us   |   Industry Info   |   Join Newsletter

Laser Scanning Helps Define Complex Thread Geometry

A manufacturer recently designed an internal-return recirculating ball nut that offers major advantages over conventional external-return recirculating ball nuts. But in machining the area of the thread where its direction changes, measures taken to overcome helical path interference produced such a complicated geometry that it was very difficult to mathematically define it.

A coordinate measuring machine (CMM) would not have been able to capture enough points within such a small area to define the geometry to the required level of accuracy. Laser Design Inc. / GKS Inspection Services Division (LDI/GKS), Plymouth, Michigan, a laser scanning service bureau, solved the problem by cutting the nut in half, using a CMM to measure key features, scanning each half of the nut to capture the internal geometry, then assembling the scans by using the CMM data as reference. “Laser scanning helped us get the new ball nut defined by accurately measuring the geometry of our prototype so we could establish dimensional limits,” said the company’s President.

The company’s internal recirculating ball nut has a unique design. For about 2/3 of a revolution, the thread is nearly identical to a conventional ball nut with balls traveling along the grooves in the forward direction. When they reach the end of this section, the balls enter a reversing groove which transports them up and over the land of the screw. When the balls reach the opposite end of the reverse groove, they are directed down into the screw at the beginning of the forward groove, at which point they begin the cycle again.

The design offers considerable advantage over conventional ball nut designs. One of the biggest advantages is its simplicity which eliminates the need for additional components such as a crossover insert or external recirculation tubes as required in conventional ball screws. The new design is also substantially more reliable because the recirculation system is so much simpler and has far fewer possible points of failure. The elimination of the external recirculation system also makes the new design considerably more compact and provides lower friction losses than conventional ball nut design.

The simplicity of the new system also makes it substantially less expensive to manufacture than conventional ball screw assemblies. The nut in the new design can be machined in a single setup on an internal grinder. The new design also avoids heat treatment movement problems inherent in ball screws that have holes through the wall and cutouts for longitudinal inserts. The company is offering to license the design and has already licensed it to a manufacturer of automotive power steering systems.

Company engineers defined the simple geometry of the internal threads on the ball screw nut on a solid modeling system. But it was impossible to build the geometry exactly as it had been designed.

The thread form is machined or ground with a milling cutter or grinding wheel that has a special form designed to produce the nut thread.  As with most internal thread grinding, the internal curvature of the nut interferes with the wheel/cutter, producing a form that is slightly different from the wheel. The engineers were able to calculate this effect, called helical path interference, for the forward and reverse threads. They compensated for it by correcting the form of the grinding wheel, despite an off axis spindle and a “live” articulating helix axis that is swinging the spindle as it grinds the passageway. They were never able to mathematically define the form produced by these components at the point where the wheel changes direction to cut the reversing passageway.

“We had to precisely define the inside dimensions of the nut so that we could define manufacturing limits,” said the company’s President. “But the form was much too complex to measure using manual gauging techniques. We considered trying to measure it with a CMM but the geometry was so complex that it would have taken an enormous effort to capture a sufficient number of points. It would have taken tens or hundreds of thousands of points to provide an adequate definition. Obtaining all of these points one-by-one by manually moving the CMM probe around the part without having a good solid model to work from would have taken forever.”

He searched for an alternative method of digitizing the model and discovered the technology of laser scanning. Laser scanning systems work by projecting a line of laser light onto surfaces while cameras continuously triangulate the changing distance and profile of the laser line as it sweeps along, enabling the object to be accurately replicated. The laser probe computer translates the video image of the line into 3D coordinates, providing real-time data renderings that give the operator immediate feedback on areas that might have been missed.

Laser scanners are able to quickly measure large parts while generating far greater numbers of data points than probes without the need for complex programming or part fixtures. Since there is no contact tip on a laser scanner that must physically touch the object, the problems of depressing soft objects, missing small details, and capturing complex free form surfaces are eliminated.

Instead of collecting points one by one, the laser scanner picks up tens of thousands of points every second. This means that the scanning of the most complicated parts can often be accomplished in a few hours or less. Laser scanning can collect data on parts that are so complex that they would be practically impossible to digitize one point at a time. Finally, the software provided with the scanner greatly simplifies the process of moving from a “point cloud” to computer aided design (CAD) model, making it possible in minimal time to generate a CAD model of the scanned part that faithfully duplicates the original part.

The company’s President did not think it made sense to purchase a machine and train staff members in its use for a single project so he searched for a service bureau that would provide laser scanning services on a project basis. “I selected GKS Inspection because of GKS’ long experience working with laser scanning technology and its application to real world engineering problems,” he said.

“We spoke with the company and first addressed the question of how to gain access to the critical internal thread forms,” said Steve DeRemer, General Manager of GKS Michigan. “We determined that the part should be cut lengthwise using a wire EDM machine. The wire EDM process allowed the part to cut without subjecting it to undue stresses that might alter the dimensions of the part.” To allow the two pieces to be aligned after cutting, the entire part was first measured on a CMM.  The internal and external diameters, end planes, notch and other features were picked up for later reference.

After cutting, temporary reference spheres were adhered to each of the two halves of the nut. Then each half was digitized on one of GKS’ laser digitizers. By laser digitizing the parts, hundreds of thousands of points were picked up on each half of the nut.

After digitizing, the point data sets from the two halves were aligned to each other using the CMM data as reference. Then the point cloud data was used to construct a solid model of the nut in SolidWorks.  Having so much point data aided in modeling the complex grooves found on the inside of the part. After modeling, the surface data was compared to the point cloud data to ensure that it conformed to the digitized part. The finished solid model was then sent to company engineers who compared the solid model to the physical part using both manual methods and a CMM.

“We are still in the process of evaluating the accuracy of the model but we are far enough along that we can say the accuracy is very good,” said the company’s President. “GKS estimated that they could achieve 0.002 inch accuracy but our measurements show they have done better than that. Laser scanning made an important contribution to this project by providing accurate dimensional measurements that would have been difficult or impossible to obtain any other way.”

For further information, contact GKS Inspection Services at 952-252-3433 or by email at: measure@gks.com

 

More GKS News and Stories
(Metrology and Laser Scanning Services)

View Laser Design News and Stories
(Laser Scanning Systems)

     Privacy     |     Legal     |     About GKS     |                                                                                                   © 2008 GKS Inspection Services